The submission appears to be a personal consultancy portfolio for a Dutch healthcare IT professional, submitted with highly exaggerated and unverifiable metadata. While the described service (healthcare process optimization) has theoretical utility, the claims of reaching 'everyone' and having 'most people' use the product are factually incorrect. The submission lacks specific evidence of traction, uses non-standard financial metrics ('marketcap' for a consultancy), and the user identity ('LunarHunter') suggests a lack of professional seriousness in the application process.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline